i mean, almost all books in the same language share at least some words
okay twitter lawywers, well-actually the hell out of me. if i cut up a book and paste together paragraphs in another order, is that a derivative work? How about sentences? Words? How about if I do it with dice? How about "Alaska for Looking"?
-
-
-
of course! what i'm trying to get at here is: if my work has the same number of words and the same amount of each word, how similar does the order have to be in order to violate the original author's copyright? and then, of course, why is an """""AI""""" different?
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Related: if I run a text through `tr`, is the result a derived work? Did the computer perform the creative act? How about `grep`?
-
Both results are derived from the original corpus, and the copyright holder of the corpus has rights to the derivative work created through these processes. At least that's my understanding.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
I just don't think we know yet. The law on derivative works is based on situations that long predate AI and automation of media. See, e.g., https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf … Short answer: It's going to have to be tested in court.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
Not a lawyer, just someone who cares: the doctrine for deciding what constitutes a derivative or transformative work comes from the court, not from legislation. Sometimes precedents differ between circuits, so the answer is not necessarily knowable without going to court.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
not a lawyer, but someone who needs a working knowledge of copyright professionally - those would all be derivative works, and the person who threw the dice would be the author.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
if you cut them up and posted them to a website that offers one book made from many where their tos says they own the product, you’re out of luck
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
If copyright precedent around sampling and remixing music is to be believed, then yes.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
There's so many ways to look at this. Eg 1/ as a human, reading tons of code, seeing interesting things and learning from it, would code I write using those lessions be a (c) violation? No, not unless I literally copied big chunks. Does Copilot emit literal chunks?
-
Yes,
@mitsuhiko demonstrated that it even emits very obviously GPL and original things like the infamous DOOM square root thing.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.