water in free space is in comets and planetary rings and ejecta from cryovolcanoes so if you want water, in the form of ice, you can just mine comets and planetary rings and vacuum up some cryovolcano gunk and then purify it
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
and conveniently, some other stuff in that ice will be things like methane, which you can use as fuel for your rockets if you want to burn it
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
basically what im saying here is, Elon Musk's plan to colonize Mars is absolutely stupid and a waste of resources in every possible way, because it's predicated on the idea that you should be landing on Mars, when landing on Mars doesnt buy you anything good
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 8 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
now to be fair, landing on earth is important for his cost goals, and thats absolutely valid as a motivation, but the goal of landing on mars is just stupid you have to think about going elsewhere or else you're barely solving the problem
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
so to circle back to the original question, if somehow technological civilization had arisen on mars instead of earth, it would've had a much easier time getting into and exploring space but that's about it. there's not much in mars's favor
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
oh yeah, a cool thing about staying exclusively in solar orbit rather than going down well is that you can set up transport systems to feed raw material from the asteroid belt down into low solar orbit, where you use high-intensity light from the sun to directly heat and refine
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
just use large solar concentrators to collect sunlight and melt the ore instead of generating electricity etc. you can do it in the belt too of course but inverse square means theyd have to be enormous. instead just move closer to the sun!
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 9 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
if you're smart, you move the whole asteroid, instead of mining it out there. slow the rock, let it slip into an elliptical orbit so it goes down towards the sun, then use high intensity sunlight to park it at a closer orbit where you can refine it using sunlight
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
when you need to send the material back out, no problem, you've got high-intensity sunlight and higher solar wind density so you can either use solar sails for that, or concentrate the sunlight to make solar thermal rockets
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
also, since space is already full of radiation, there's no point in NOT using nuclear thermal rockets. you're not polluting space with more radiation than is already there, unlikely on earth. so if you're really worried about transport, it's fine, you have plenty of thrust
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 9 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen
don't NTRs release a bunch of radionuclides, at fairly low velocities? those last a while and probably _will_ end up polluting some areas, especially if you're building at stable points
-
-
Antwort an @NoraDotCodes
low velocities in space are still quite fast. but also, the expanding gas cloud will be so low density within minutes that it wont matter really it depends on the kind of rocket design anyway. gas core rockets can be way nastier b/c of the mixing of radionuclides with propellant
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @beka_valentine @NoraDotCodes
this is a place where
@BeyondNerva would have a lot to say tho. im only passingly familiar, but from what i know, solid core NTRs are perfectly capable of running fairly cleanly and gas cores spew radiation but not so much as to be a problem1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir - Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.