“I’m leaving GitHub because copilot uses my OpenSource code for training” is such an odd move. Anyone can fork it to there and GitHub can feed OpenSource code from anywhere to it and US copyright law permits this. I’m also pretty certain we should not strengthen copyright laws …
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
Antwort an @mitsuhiko
If a dev doesn't intend for their code to be used by others, they shouldn't Open Source it. I consider it a badge of honor if another dev uses my code.
5 Antworten 1 Retweet 43 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @techbubble @mitsuhiko
My code is licensed. People have to obey that license when they reuse it. I don't see why GH gets to just ignore that license.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 7 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @NoraDotCodes @mitsuhiko
I agree. This technology raises an important question — is GH responsible for license compliance or is the dev who uses the code responsible? Or both? Or should GH make the dev aware of the license and the dev is responsible?
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
GitHub is creating a derivative work from my code, right? Their model would definitely be different if it had not been trained on my code.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.