And it's utterly despicable when you understand that they're funding it with the hoarded wealth of workers who are struggling just to exist. With ill-gotten money made from supply chains that enslave people and are destroying the future possibility of life on earth. /
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
But if it troubles you that they might SUCCEED, that those three assholes might ever spend more than a week in space and ENJOY it, let me put your mind at ease. Not in this lifetime. With all their billions, they have no power to make space a better place to be than earth./
22 Antworten 1.686 Retweets 30.993 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
I don't know if they realize the futility, if they're AWARE that this whole space race is just a pissing contest to see who can get to zero-G fastest? Or if being a billionaire makes you so delusional that they really think they can buy a Mars colony in their lifetimes. IDK /
49 Antworten 1.169 Retweets 25.876 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
Join me in enjoying the fact that they won't find anything up there but a lot of time to sit with the gaping void inside them, which space certainly won't fill, while forcibly holding their asscheeks to a suctioning toilet seat, bc they're constipated as hell from astronaut food.
78 Antworten 2.070 Retweets 35.750 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
The world is burning, and our billionaires are the people MOST responsible, but at least there's no escape for them. They will live and die (alone, like all of us) on this beautiful, precious, one-in-a-gazillion planet. We should take our wealth back from them and use it better.
584 Antworten 8.865 Retweets 67.247 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
Oy vey. To the Muskophiles who've found this thread: Everything Musk can do, NASA could do better, if they had the funding. They don't always have the funding, because billionaires hoard our collective wealth, and use it to make redundant space agencies to boost their egos.
49 Antworten 311 Retweets 2.005 Gefällt mirDiesen Thread anzeigen -
Antwort an @sim_kern
I was with you through this entire thread, but to say that NASA could do better than SpaceX with more money ignores the fact that throughout its history NASA has used commercial partnerships for almost all aspects of spacecraft development & production, including funding SpaceX!
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 24 Gefällt mir -
Their role is to coordinate industry partners. To say that NASA could do better than SpaceX can alone is to simply state the obvious: the entire aerospace industry working towards one goal is better at getting there than one company.
3 Antworten 1 Retweet 63 Gefällt mir -
i hate this argument because SLS has been given more money than jesus and it is a shitshow. The Space shuttle was bad, and even with the DoD requirements it was worse than Soyuz!
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 7 Gefällt mir -
Space Shuttle had problems but it did enable a new era of space exploration that largely would have been the domain only of the military without NASA being involved.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mir
What does it even mean to say it was "worse than Soyuz"? It's not a sports car, it's a complex and powerful tool for putting people and mass into various orbits, and it was both more capable and more reliable, at the time, than Soyuz.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.