Update: it was. "Once, GitHub Copilot suggested starting an empty file with something it had even seen more than a whopping 700,000 different times during training -- that was the GNU General Public License." https://docs.github.com/en/github/copilot/research-recitation …https://twitter.com/NoraDotCodes/status/1410254903445012482 …
-
I am not sure how the argument holds. If Copilot does not include on its own source code any of that GPL code, I am not sure that it matters the training data, as it's not part of the software distribution.
open source” as is feasible.
True - but if it includes AGPL code, which it does, even the server-side code is covered.
-
-
And my position is that if GPL code is part of the training data, and all they’ve done is multiplied that by some sigma values, the generated code is a derived work based on that GPL code and thus must be distributed under the same terms.
-
That would be really lovely! I don't feel prepared to defend that, even informally, bit it's certainly attractive.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.