I don't actually think anyone wants big decentralized chat systems like mastadon; what they want is a big centrally run chat system with no friction but that isn't completely co-opted by corporate garbage.
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
Specifically, by allowing individual servers to define their identity through branding, moderation, and alternative interfaces, the Fediverse has an inbuilt commitment to diversity and community-mindedness that's all but impossible in centralized spaces.
In fact, Discord is so successful partly because it simulates a federated system! They even call communities "servers"!
-
-
As long as the protocols we use are resistant to the kind of fedi-specific threats we see in Mastodon now, and resilient in a way that lets them evolve over time (as ActivityPub is), we can both move quickly and reduce the risk of corporate meddling.
-
All this not to take away from your point - users _should_ be insulated from federation issues in some areas, though not everywhere. Just, social media/microblogging's issues are different from chat's, and we have to think about those issues differently in different spaces.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Server has special meaning to you, because you are technically well versed. They could as well have called it "community", "group", "instance" or invented something novel. But "server" fits the gaming background quite well, despite not technically being correct.
-
Sure. In Matrix we call the same concept Spaces.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.