You've never seen thin-net jam when one station had a bad card and made everyone else think the network was busy and never free? CDMA only works when every station on the network obeys the rules (or minimally breaks them; was it the 3Com card that transmitted early? Not sure).
-
-
Antwort an @sweharris @fanf und
I think in any distributed comms system you have to have a commonly agreed system of rules I.e protocol
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @rusk_redux @sweharris und
You sure not confusing with Ethernet? CSMA/CD? CDMA is something different, more like FDM in the digital domain.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @rusk_redux @fanf und
Sorry, yes. But here we don't have a spectrum, we just have a single value. An infinitely variable value, but just a single value. So the jamming resistance of CDMA doesn't seem to apply; the jammer effectively blocks the whole range in one go with a single transmission.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @sweharris @rusk_redux und
Sure you have a spectrum. The voltage between ends of an antenna is a scalar, and it _does_ pick up all frequencies, although some more strongly than others; it's up to the rest of the circuitry to filter down to the one you care about. I think CDMA is a great idea here.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @NoraDotCodes @rusk_redux und
Then I'm clearly misunderstanding what you meant by "single value". An attacker doesn't need to block values in the spectrum between 50->100 or 100->200 or... they just need to keep asserting 42, and if they do it quicker than you can sample and read then you'll only get 42.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @sweharris @rusk_redux und
Yeah, apologies - that was maybe unclear. If you think about something like the electromagnetic field (which is a vector field), you can measure its value at any time at a given point in space. By measuring rapidly (at some frequency S) you are able to observe multiple signals...
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @NoraDotCodes @sweharris und
... of any frequency below S/2 (by Nyquist). This is a similar idea, except without the requirement of "any point in space"; it's as if when you put up an antenna, you got the same stations, no matter where in the universe you are.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @NoraDotCodes @rusk_redux und
_If_ I'm understanding this right (no guarantees!) then it would need to be accumulative; if I transmitted a 1 & you transmitted a 1 at the same time then the measured value would be a 2, universally. In that scenario I think we'd be able to discern separate signals by sampling.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @sweharris @rusk_redux und
Yeah, I think so! To get into weird speculative physics, which of course doesn't _actually_ make sense, I think moving the US's value would take some finite amount of energy, and the US would seek its resting state, shedding that energy over time...
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
...(by, say, spreading it out as thermal energy across all particles in the universe, so as to conserve energy, or maybe spontaneously creating some particles somewhere?)
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.