I can’t make this right now but my question @verified is why people have to be famous to protect their identities? All of the categories in the new rules imply having an audience/clout. What about “normal” people? They can be harmed too.https://twitter.com/ashleymcnamara/status/1400893824654741506 …
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
because they don't want to go through the trouble of verifying peoples' identities. it would require them to actually pay some employees which they are fundamentally against. anyway we have a perfectly good way to verify everyone's identities but GPG is hard so nobody uses it
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Agreed that it’s about staffing and that GPG is too hard.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
I think a good GPG frontend would help a lot with this, although Twitter &c would need to have some kind of first class support in order for it to take off. I'm all for people actually doing WoT again though, it does work pretty well
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
I don’t see GPG ever being more than niche. I started using PGP in the 90s and it’s not gotten much less niche than it was then. A better front end would help but folks need to understand public key and that’s a lot to ask.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
I don't think so - I could be wrong but I think people understand "username and password" well enough, and making that analogy has been very successful in getting non-techy academics to use Keybase effectively (when I used to recommend Keybase, lol)
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.