Noon in Korea

@NoonInKorea

Korean News in English. Manned by Brian A in ON; SB Jeon in SK; SH Kim in NY

RoK, US, Canada
Joined December 2016

Tweets

You blocked @NoonInKorea

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @NoonInKorea

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Aug 3
    Replying to

    Think aloud: why is NK doing this? Becuz it's a surveillance state. And why is it a surveillance state? Because of its state ideology: GLA

  2. 17 minutes ago
    Replying to

    during Pyeongchang Olympics, he responded coyly, "Well, no one knows that for sure."

  3. 18 minutes ago
    Replying to

    "Plan B to Pyeongchang" & no alternative site being considered for any contingency. But per AP, when Jang asked if SK will remain safe

  4. 20 minutes ago
    Replying to

    is even entertaining possibility of letting NK athletes compete by giving them "wildcard spots" in competition. Bach in fact said there's no

  5. 22 minutes ago
    Replying to

    Last checked NK's IOC member Jang Woong said NK will attend if any of their athletes qualify. And IOC's Thomas Bach

  6. 25 minutes ago
    Replying to

    We're only 140 days away. Pyeongchang's Olympic committee is alarmed but expected to start reassurance campaign by stressing NK may attend.

  7. 28 minutes ago
    Replying to

    It was bound to happen: Can't blame athletes from being skittish but France's sports minister?

  8. 33 minutes ago

    France's sports minister says France not firm on attending Pyeongchang if situation worsens & safety not guaranteed

  9. 1 hour ago
    Replying to

    By doing something remotely similar, NK may be calculating it can secure "nuke club status": it will then "declare that it has arrived."

  10. 1 hour ago
    Replying to

    NK is prolly familiar with Bikini Island's nuke tests conducted on/above & under the sea that caused evacuations & huge controversy in 1950s

  11. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    There are clues in NK's recent statements. After Sep 3, NK said it's "nearing completion"; didn't says it was done, suggesting more to come.

  12. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Trump's comment may have accelerated the timetable but NK may have felt "air-testing" necessary anyway to secure "nuke club status."

  13. 2 hours ago

    SK analysts think NK was never satisfied with underground nuke testing & "air testing" was already being considered

  14. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Ri didn't say [to magnify fear]. That's interpreting what he seems to be trying to convey as KJU's humble servant.

  15. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Ran out of space in prev tweet: Ri said rather than doing something unprecedented land-based, might do it over Pacific O [to magnify fear]

  16. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    What Ri Yong-ho said is this: "Rather than doing unprecedented, land-based H-bomb testing, KJU might consider doing it over Ocean Pacific."

  17. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    "My father's mad & when he gets mad, no one can control him. He just might go crazy & go postal. He's nuttier than squirrel droppings."

  18. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Presumably over unclaimed Pacific waters (far from Tokyo). Ri's using a psychological ploy to say this: presumably Ri in touch w Pyongyang.

  19. 2 hours ago
    Replying to

    Straight from the horse's mouth: "What [KJU] might mean is conducting land-based H-bomb test over Pacific waters"

  20. 3 hours ago
    Replying to

    Except it may be considered a blockade or act of war by NK. NK usually doesn't do provocations that can be easily detected or forestalled

  21. 3 hours ago
    Replying to

    Would be logistically easy to stop NK's submarine-based H-bomb testing in the Pacific: nuke subs can catch them in the act & forestall it.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·