So @TeamYouTube just reinstated at least two white supremacist channels and *apologized* to them and now won’t give an answer to any journalists as to why just because, you know, they have no competition and don’t need to answer for anything.https://boingboing.net/2019/08/29/youtube-reinstated-these-extre.html …
-
-
Replying to @slpng_giants @TeamYouTube
I really don't get why journalists insist on calling white supremacists, "nationalists." They are NOT nationalists. They clearly do not support our NATION. They only support WHITE people.
1 reply 8 retweets 56 likes -
Did you look up the long held meaning?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure. Here ya go: Nationalist noun a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeaponizedVoter @momathena and
This is what it meant when I was growing up, and this is what it means, today. If the journalists can't be bothered to acquire a FUKKING vocabulary, they have no business writing.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @WeaponizedVoter @momathena and
aren't they more correctly White Nationalists though? As in a Nation for Whites exclusively?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No. Well, you can. It just defines the where more. But I'm aware of several small nations that have gone through a nationalist agenda....Rwanda, Myanmar......even Iceland used that approach in a gentle way to establish it's shop local attitude.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The issue is the difference between the Nation and the State. The State has physical borders, the Nation is people. They are White Nationalists, because they believe (as White Supremacists) that white folks should either be a) supreme or b) the only members of, the Nation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

w/