Probably wiser to look at contexts than neurons or even individual psyches in isolation. Maria Popova: "…even the most visionary geniuses are still products of their time and place, and can’t fully escape the limitations and biases of their respective era…"https://twitter.com/anitaleirfall/status/1238418970031636480 …
-
Show this thread
-
"…or as Virginia Woolf memorably put it in Orlando, 'It is probable that the human spirit has its place in time assigned to it.'" That very assigning must be scrutinized. What most restricts us is often what looms over us, the roles assigned to us by "the powers that be."
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
S. Ramón y Cajal does some assigning of his own. Maria Popova summarizes: "Considering the all too pervasive paradox of creative people 'who are wonderfully talented and full of energy and initiative [but] who never produce any original work and almost never write anything'…"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"…Cajal divides them into six classes according to the 'diseases of the will' afflicting them—contemplators, bibliophiles and polyglots, megalomaniacs, instrument addicts, misfits, and theorists." How many diseases of the will are the byproducts/symptoms of diseases of society?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Ramón y Cajal writes: "[Contemplators] love the study of nature but only for its aesthetic qualities—the sublime spectacles, the beautiful forms, the splendid colors, and the graceful structures." Was he some variety of contemplator himself? See Recollections of My Life excerpt
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"Like the entomologist in search of colorful butterflies, my attention has chased in the gardens of the grey matter cells with delicate and elegant shapes, the mysterious butterflies of the soul, whose beating of wings may one day reveal to us the secrets of the mind."pic.twitter.com/dh3Ie5nVTF
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Popova observes: "With an eye to his own chosen field of histology, which he revolutionized by using beauty to illuminate the workings of the brain..."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"...Cajal notes that a contemplator will master the finest artistic techniques 'without ever feeling the slightest temptation to apply them to a new problem, or to the solution of a hotly contested issue.'" The armchair philosopher, armchair artist, armchair neuroscientist.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Perhaps Santiago Ramón y Cajal is even referring to the armchair (or meditation cushion) contemplative. This sort of "contemplator," however, ideally brings this aesthetic appreciation with them beyond the cushion and puts their art, their discoveries, into practice.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Then comes Ramón y Cajal's critique of the bookworm.

pic.twitter.com/p7ADK0tSzX
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
The issue that Santiago Ramón y Cajal takes with this scholarly type is also his impracticality. Whether contemplative or intellectual, practical application is key. Spiritual matters are best put into practice for their liberating effects, not merely studied theoretically.pic.twitter.com/6RuIK3gR0x
-
-
"No one would deny the fact that he who knows and acts is the one who counts, not he who knows and falls asleep." Santiago Ramón y Cajal
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.