"One who is not awake does not understand the non-existence of a sense-object seen in a dream." Vasubandhu
Keep in mind that just prior, it was stated, "But that is not how it is," from the Sanskrit na caivam bhavati. The devil's advocate lays out the premises but states they are *not* the case, therefore the conclusion does *not* follow.
-
-
The voice shifts back in the next segment ("Just so..."), which contains Vasubandhu's rebuttal.
-
I think this segment should be skipped when quoting, for it creates a confusion. I composed a shorter version from your tweets: https://t.me/Yogacara/202 Seems fine to me now :)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.