"This body composed of the four great elements is seen standing for a year, two years, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, a hundred years or more." 1/2
-
Show this thread
-
"But what's called 'mind,' 'intellect,' or 'consciousness' by day and by night arises as one thing and ceases as another." 2/2
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Assutavā Sutta
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NoaidiX
Where is the thread which connects all of this material. Bits and pieces strewn all over without a connecting text which presents a whole theory. Everybody seems to spend all of their time chasing the ghosts of words which no longer have context
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @memeristor @NoaidiX
No experiential data connecting the theology to the practicality of practice. Buddhist examine everything from the perspective of mind and the theist the emotions. What connects the two?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @memeristor @NoaidiX
what connects two exclusive points in
#QM is called one distance, "like" one square root of two is infinitely smaller (in motion) than one square root of three (in motion) ... so another scientific word (in English) for "whole" is "integer"; as other languages use different marks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanHawkley @memeristor
Integration of integers: 一即一切一切即一/一切即一一即一切
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NoaidiX @DanHawkley
"One is everything and everything is one" What does it matter that the spear which impaled me was "I" and i it? The rain is not the drop the drop not the river the river not the lake the lake not the ocean nevertheless all are one. All above are the same and not the same.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @memeristor @NoaidiX
everything is "oneness"; "other identities" are called "integer points, distances, areas, volumes and integer fields"; so predicting "zero points" is a lost cause in favor of being "smarter than a chickenTurtleSquash"
#nonduality#nonbranded1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Perhaps the so-called "individual" (individualis) is in actuality infinitely divisible. Each whole is infinitely multipliable and each part is infinitely divisible yet both amount to zero (śūnya).
-
-
Replying to @NoaidiX @memeristor
it's as simple as "supposing"
#more#additional#nonduality:#additional (including multiplication divided by division)#excluding =#denying =#predicting#dualityAsCannotExistLikeNonduality or (see SAND site): \sqrt{E/m} where E =#Constant (+) =#Nonduality (+)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
yowza? :)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.