This thread is way too adversarial toward tech companies, but the conclusion - that taxing big businesses to pay for housing the homeless - is absolutely right. Prop C is good.https://twitter.com/Pat_Garofalo/status/1057378603124645889 …
-
-
The problem is much more with the Denominator then the numerator, and Prop C barely helps with that. SF needs to build massively more housing, that's the only long-term positive solution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rewarding the privatization of rent = public policy.
-
As a sort of quasi intra-marginal techie, I can say with absolute confidence that the primary challenges I face have nothing to do with wages, and everything to do with public policy that allows speculative forces to price me out of the region I work.
-
Meanwhile in that same time period, those who locked in low mortgages have seen their home prices double. Do you believe these people are 'doubling' their productivity or are they rewarded by the efforts of others who own no land?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.