This is wrong, of course. SCOTUS ruled in 1898 that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" meant subject to U.S. law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark …). Arguing that illegal immigrants aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. would mean that U.S. law doesn't apply to them.https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1057362118633238528 …
-
-
That too, but diplomats was specifically cited as an example by drafters of the 14th.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.