I'm not going to pretend to know the specifics, though. There are a number of obvious threats to the United States, as well as unknown threats. Splitting into smaller states with different governmental policies may be the best defense against an uncertain future.
-
-
I encourage everyone who thinks America is at an unprecedented level of division and craziness to read Nixonland.
-
Nixon obliterated his opponents in 1968 and especially 1972. He was incredibly popular before Watergate.
-
1968 was fairly close, actually.
-
I was trolling a bit. It wasn't close in electoral college as much though.
-
It was reasonably close, not a landslide!
-
I was using Trumpian definition of EC > 300 = Landslide. Ignoring my troll there I think very few people have an idea of how big a landslide 1972 was for Nixon both EC and especially popular vote.
-
Seriously though despite my Trumpian sympathies I think it would be a good idea for Dems to lose the House and move more to the center. I could easily see myself voting for someone like Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz but he can't win a Dem primary in the party as it is today.
-
Trump is dog poo. You can build a car out of dog poo but it won't go from 0 to 60.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well if Republicans manage to buck history and hold House majority (Senate is already baked in) it will make 2016 election outrage look quaint.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t know about that. Incumbents always have the advantage, but his numbers are terrible with a great economy. If the economy doesn’t stay quite so great...?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
