"What do you think about just converting the loans to interest free? That's the part that I find most objectionable as private institutions are making generous profit for not really doing anything." <-- But doing this wouldn't cut out the need for processing
So you're saying I doubt stuff, while you proceed serenely forward, untroubled by any pesky facts that contradict your thesis? :-)
-
-
Haha, no, I'm saying that you are very energetically arguing against a point I didn't make while very smugly congratulating yourself while not exactly demonstrating a great command of the subject.
-
But none of that is true. I guess I haven't deleted my tweets and blocked you yet, if that qualifies as "energetic". You've failed to engage with my central point (i.e. that loan processors aren't a major factor in the student debt crisis). And my command of the subject is great.
-
Your whole argument has been based on an initial mistake (you thought private companies owned the loans) that you tried to finesse by diverting to a complaint about third party processors that has very little to do with the loan crisis. Fairly poor command of the subject! :-)
-
And to be honest, this has all been a consistent theme in your tweets to me. Really, a very poor performance over an extended period of time.
-
Please. We have had many positive exchanges, and two disagreements. But whatever.
-
I feel like it's been quite a bit more than that, but maybe my memory fails me. In any case it's not worth checking.
-
That I agree with. I genuinely enjoy your posts, learn a lot from you. We disagreed about some nonsense about Classical Liberalism - not much on substance, just on the nature of the ideology. And then this.
-
Stop fighting Mom and Dad
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.