Agree with #2. But people please quit reinforcing inaccurate stereotypes. There is **zero** evidence that there’s more “worthless drivel” in gender studies than anywhere else.https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/1052766924621279232 …
-
-
Replying to @erinhengel
Out of curiosity, what sort of evidence would allow us to compare the amounts of drivel across fields with diverse methods, purposes, and domains of applicability?
6 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Noahpinion
I can’t think of any existing evidence that would allow us to compare fields. But a large scale Sokal^2 across a large number of fields (including economics!) obviously would
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @erinhengel @Noahpinion
Also, this hoax is worth remembering:http://news.mit.edu/2015/how-three-mit-students-fooled-scientific-journals-0414 …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @erinhengel
Hee. That was a good one. :-)
11:56 PM - 17 Oct 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.