Trump needs to revive the TPP. If it's under a new, Trumpy name, then fine. But TPP needs to return.https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-10-16/best-best-way-trump-can-squeeze-china-on-trade-is-with-new-tpp …
-
-
The IP sections are currently suspended. If I understood TPP correctly, they would have reinstated on the US re-entering. With CPTPP, there would have to be agreement that the provisions be reinstated. US unlikely to rejoin without.https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/cptpp/tpp-and-cptpp-the-differences-explained/#what …
-
But we should! And the new NAFTA replacement shows we very well might. Now take your assertion back, Eric!
-
You should, but none of the rest of us should let you in. Not a trustworthy counterparty. Any increased market access to the US could be undone in a second by the Idiot declaring that some sector is strategic and so tariffs apply.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.