That’s right, I just imagined walking into a public library and borrowing four books today. And there’s no way that it would have cost 95% of the population of any country a year’s wages to get much worse books in any pre-capitalist system We’re better off. Objective fact.
-
-
Look if, for example, a single person was emitting 40% of the world's CO2 this argument becomes completely absurd. It matters who emits the most greenhouse gases because bringing their levels of emissions in line with the rest of the world is the fastest way to reduce emissions
-
Not necessarily. Often that just makes coal and oil cheaper on the world market, allowing other countries to buy and burn more of it, so that their emissions replace the emissions reductions of the other countries.
-
So you agree then that the climate change is inherently driven by market forces and that any solution requires their abolition?
-
If you could establish a benevolent world government, sure, it could solve the problem.
-
But, like, I don't think that's actually possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.