This is a rare completely wrong thread from @noahpinion. This tweet is untrue: US emissions have declined, but not thru explicit govt leadership, which means we didn't engage in a collective action that can be seen by others as "leading". /1https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1051675213375528960 …
-
-
That's a lack of political imagination. I have no idea whether Chinese emissions would have grown significantly less to date, but we would have the framework for international environmental regulation we need now, but which instead never came into existence.
-
Yes, perhaps if we simply apply *more* magic, the magic will work...
-
International treaties and norms of interstate conduct are not "magic". For example, WTO treaty commitments are mostly observed, even though the enforcement procedures are woefully slow and inadequate.
-
Look: you cannot try to impose standards on someone else, or make any serious demand that someone else follow standards, if there are no standards, and you don't follow any yourself.
-
A) That is an assertion with no apparent evidence to back it up, B) "Imposing standards" is probably not the way to get results anyway, since each country faces such different challenges in reducing emissions, C) Please read my article and check my proposed policies!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.