Fair. "Feasible" betterhttps://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1051865821440405504 …
-
-
That pnas paper was IMMENSELY popular. Fact that relied on crazy assumptions didn't matter. It fit desired narrative.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/business/energy-environment/renewable-energy-national-academy-matt-jacobson.html …
-
Yeah it was unrealistic. But still, alternative energy tech is necessary.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also depends on our ability to deploy firm carbon-free energy like geothermal to help support the energy mix.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.