Dude! Can we look at emissions per capita or per worker?! I get that trade volumes are levels not rates but still
-
-
-
Doesn't matter. That's illusion-of-control.
-
But aggregate emissions show an “illusion of impact,” when the populations involved are 4x-5x different
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is a really good set of posts. My only suggestion wld be to take IPCC with a larger grain of salt with regard to their tone of immediate panic (Eg ‘dire’ when no predict I’ve seen predicts mass starvation or quick flooding or ...).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Regardless. Are China and the US on different earths?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but also, different countries have different preferences for pollution...and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Developing countries might be okay with trading off more carbon in exchange for growth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.