Given this, of which of your articles or threads are you most proud?
-
-
-
Hmm. Dunno. I'm vaguely dissatisfied by almost everything I write.
-
Ha! Prolly a sign of a solid professional. Still, as someone who uses jargon to write (music-related), I’d be interested to see. I’m sure others would be in context of this tweet. if not you, someone else’s writing you like?
-
Well, I think Krugman is the best at this, and that's why he's the most famous. Wolfers is really good too.
-
Good point. Fame is probably the best indicator.
-
A lot of Fed people do this really well too, but labor in obscurity.
-
Yes. The obscure genius in any given high-skill field is ever-humbling. But not humbling enough to make me stops trying ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Krugman isn't important because of his economics nobel. He's important because his NYtimes column is written in plain english.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kryptonite: Thinking and writing like someone who has only taken Econ 101.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One must compensate for the externality of bad writing. Wait a sec...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.