This thread demonstrates that a lot of academic writing that *looks* like utter nonsense is merely scholars dressing up a useful but mundane point with a ton of unnecessary jargon.https://twitter.com/JeffreyASachs/status/1051097280030396417 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Those are the bad physics teachers :P. The whole point of science is to distill the inscrutable complexity of the world into as simply comprehensible and understandable pieces and terms as possible. If you’re making things even more inscrutable you’re doing it wrong.
I graduated in maths and work finance. Is a lot of the stuff in economics papers what I'd call "faux maths" 1/2
By which I mean if we see e.g. G = f(p,E,I) Where G = growth p = productivity E = employment rate I = interest rates it just means growth bears some (unspecified) relationship to productivity, employment rates and interest rates. And making it "mathsy" adds nothing at all? 2/2
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.