He didn’t use the original recording. So therefore it’s an original cover of the song. And you didn’t read his whole tweet. On YouTube the publisher takes 100% while on Spotify a cover song just like his the publisher only takes 25% revenue
-
-
Replying to @MissionZero0000 @roomieofficial and
So spotify supports fraud That is cool.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RonJ24995209 @roomieofficial and
No they support musicians trying to make a living. If someone straight reuploads someone else’s song and still get money it’s fraud but it’s not it’s an original cover.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MissionZero0000 @roomieofficial and
To do a cover, you need permission from the artist, no? If they didn't, then it is stealing. Eating grapes before buying them in store, crossing in mid street. All illegal. Silly AF, I don't like it. But thems the facts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ok so Nirvana doing the man who sold the world means they stole the song and shouldn't play it live on a concert they are making money in. Got it. Oh sorry, they don't apply because they are "real artists" right? Fuck off.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.