-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
but why would you want the short version
-
Because you don't have iTunes??
-
Lol I just use youtube
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
or you could just listen to the whole thing for free literally anywhere on the internet...
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Should always be free! Both versions!
-
It wasn't free to make it.
-
It was a glorified commercial made for advertising. Yes, it should be free.
-
The singer wasn't free. The background music wasn't free. The lyrics wasn't free. Therefor the song should not be for free. How would Company stay in business with your perception.pic.twitter.com/gCeJUVdFFU
-
And yet it's still advertising. Companies make more expensive commercials every day and get charged to air!
-
Companies spend money to generate something positive for them, soundtrack or tv commercial makes no difference, because they spent money on both with the same objective: to generate some sort of Gain
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.