Other interpretation: content is weaker (> priority/time of peer reviewing), so women (can) focus on form.
Female-authored papers take six months longer to complete peer-review at Econometrica h/t @Undercoverhistpic.twitter.com/gkr6IbN98M
-
-
-
Further, women as group better w/ language, and more agreeable. Why would the 1-6% not simply reflect that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your posts are ~6% more readable than twitter avg. To be fair they are often the title of the linked article
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or referees put more effort into helping female authors improve their paper?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they need more time because they are usually inaccurate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do we know whether it's journal taking longer or revisions taking longer?
-
not that I see. data is time between first submission date & final acceptance date, but no disaggregated info
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.