@NinaTotenberg not with a 35-foot buffer zone, I feel confident in saying
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@NinaTotenberg This is not a novel concept. What's novel is a law that forces religious business people to violate their conscience. -
@reepitweep@NinaTotenberg And what if the Catholic “conscience” disagrees with the Muslim “conscience?” No…too risky.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NinaTotenberg@nprpolitics If Corporations are not only people but "god fearing people" there arguably is no line - whatever they say goes. -
@NinaTotenberg@nprpolitics The goal of a corp. by law is to make money, odd if they also now are to have a conscience - about just 1 thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NinaTotenberg there's no limit I can see. -
@Profepps@NinaTotenberg Roberts seemed to be groping toward a closely held/large public distinction. -
@MichaelMcGough3@NinaTotenberg question is CLAIMS not CLAIMANTS. Do close corps get to opt out of civil rts, emp dis, enviro, health? -
@Profepps@NinaTotenberg Ah, that is more important. -
If HL wins, can companies owned by Christian Scientists deny coverage for... everything? RT
@MichaelMcGough3@Profepps@NinaTotenberg -
Tweet unavailable
-
In the case of for profit companies, the answer is never before this case. RT
@Maggyw519@MichaelMcGough3@Profepps@NinaTotenberg
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NinaTotenberg@nprpolitics It sets a dangerous precedent. Will I need to know a CEO's religious affiliations before accepting a job? -
@chrismiller262 Will a corporation be able to fire you if they don't approve of your religion?@NinaTotenberg@nprpolitics
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@bloodless_coup@NinaTotenberg@nprpolitics Um as opposed to all those other issues that they, like, totally get? Short list, that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.