And by "coincidence" you mean "agent"https://twitter.com/waldojaquith/status/901595077562302465 …
-
-
And if you didn't want attacks on your livelihood you shouldn't have picked one as a propagandist for a dictator and a neo-Nazi!
-
You're an imbecile if you simultaneously criticize Stalin and think that people shouldn't be able to feed their family because of politics.
-
Your problem isn't with the gov't, but with society. You want to be exempt from the social consequences of your actions. That's impossible.
-
You're deliberately reducing my comparison to literal equivalence. What actions would those be? Guilt by association? "Pro-Russian" tweets?
-
People EVERYWHERE act as enforcers of social behavior/views. There's no escaping society. Either moderate your views or live on the margins.
-
I don't speak for society. We both know holding your views is socially unacceptable and costly. It's up to you to decide if it's worthwhile.
-
The superiority of 100-year norms is an amusing argument considering neither of us would be allowed to debate in public in 1917.
-
"The Emperor of All Russians possesses Supreme Power. Obedience to Him, not only out of fear, but in good conscience, is ordained by God".
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nina, we already had this conversation. Are you so irony-proof that you can't see why "Stalinist purge" is a strange choice?
-
I see we had the same idea for a rejoinder
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stalin killed 10-20 million people. So not the same. Besides as a Putin stooge don't you use "Stalinist" as a compliment?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


| Geopol and Russia analyst | Instagram: