1. Social media is full of imbeciles who oppose intervening in Syria, but fully support it in North Korea.
-
-
5. North Korea is less predictable and better armed, and even hawks in Washington won't risk an intervention that would harm South Korea.
-
6. Putting troops next/close to a foreign country's borders and calling any response "aggression" is what NATO has been doing to Russia.
-
7. This hostile tactic involves accusing your opponent of what you yourself are doing.
-
8. Indeed, Washington as a thorn in the Korean peninsula is really about China's expanding influence in the region.https://twitter.com/kingbaeksu/status/852344283038220288 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Agree with sentiment. But, do you think
#SouthKorea would be safe from attacks or at minimum harassment without US presence?#toughquestionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


| Geopol and Russia analyst | Instagram: