SGX is on Core not on PCH just saying
-
-
-
Are you sure?
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I WENT INTO INFOSEC AND ALL I GOT WAS SAD
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
From https://software.intel.com/en-us/documentation/sgx-sdk-installation/SGX-platform-software …: “There is a dependency between Platform Services and ME/CSE. [...]. However, when the AESM service attempts to launch the Platform Service Enclave (PSE), the AESM will report an error if a component of the DAL stack or ME stack is not installed.”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
BTW Google has a nice open-source project to replace almost all UEFI blobware with Linux & Go: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Google-NERF-UEFI-Linux … https://trmm.net/NERF
-
coreboot is still a cleaner approach. But nevertheless Intel stil provides only blobs for memory and platform initialization.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Just updated my EFI and then the ME. I don't even want to know what the patch penetration will be. Probably <5%. This is bad.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
oh come on, your "operating system" is just an application running (occasionally) atop the real os. the abstract loader is just a bonus rpc mechanism.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yes going briefly through paper and this suggests ME is just used as proxy to provide tunnel to backend again analyze DAL ...
-
You can found module named "TCB" in ME, coincidence?;)
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.