Responsible voters would not need term limits. It feels to me like a total (A) admission of failure on the electorate's fault, (B) abnegation of responsibility, and (C) misdiagnosis. The problem isn't AOC, Schumer, Schiff, etc. It's the people who freely elect them.
This is not about party. It is about good government. Term limits allow for true citizen government And results. We have them for the President and most governors, why not Congress? 
https://twitter.com/standamericanow/status/1102992170863124480 …
0:06
-
-
-
I’m not seeing Louie Gohmert and Steve King on those lists. Wonder why that is?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because they make legislators weaker and government worse.
-
We have term limits. They are called "elections."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, it’s about your ambition. And they’re unconstitutional
-
I’m not sure that an appeal to this SCt would bring the same result, Mark.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know who ends up running the show when you term-limit legislators? Lobbyists and unelected bureaucrats and staffers. No thanks. If you want to make it so there are fewer multi-decade careers in Congress, eliminate partisan redistricting and make every seat competitive.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Elections are term limits. The legislative branch is more representative of the people, let the people decide who the want to represent them.
-
Not necessarily. Voters often get reps they didn’t vote for.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.