Exactly so.
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @Efroymson @opticon9 i sljedećem broju korisnika:
The metric is based on consent and opposition to a ritualized Iron Age practice. The truth is that you would see it the same way were it not for cultural/religious baggage clouding your judgement.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Helioprogenus @opticon9 i sljedećem broju korisnika:
So you also are opposed to marriage, and burial of the dead?
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Efroymson @opticon9 i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Marriage is between consenting adults as is burial practices so I don't really care how one exercises their beliefs. What I do care about is permanently altering a body part or the harming of others based on an archaic belief
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Helioprogenus @opticon9 i sljedećem broju korisnika:
I’m not sure that the deceased is exactly consenting. Advanced directives are common, but not universal. Also I understood you to object to Iron Age practices simply on the grounds that they are ancient.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Efroymson @Helioprogenus i sljedećem broju korisnika:
You think that doing things to corpses is akin to doing things to babies?
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @opticon9 @Efroymson i sljedećem broju korisnika:
He's just trying hard to find holes in my admittedly sloppy responses but the bottom line, the elephant in the room, is that ritual infant circumcision is a harmful practice that alters a body irreversibly and would be considered wrong if not for cultural/religious practices.
1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Helioprogenus @opticon9 i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Sometimes sloppy writing reflects sloppy thinking. Further, I’ve argued here, and elsewhere, that circumcision is not harmful. http://efroymson.blogspot.com/2017/12/male-circumcision-is-worthwhile-public.html?m=1 …
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Efroymson @Helioprogenus i sljedećem broju korisnika:
I can find Jewish thinkers going back millenia and modern Orthodox arguing how it is. Or I guess they don't think really think it's "harmful", because the reduction in pleasure (and lust) is good. Why should we trust you over them? https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/379485/jewish/Healing-Swollen-Ego.htm …pic.twitter.com/rXBwaUGhtn
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Nijrisupmat @Efroymson i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Funny how these are never mentioned when Jews (and other groups) fanatically defend it and demand it be kept legal everywhere, or when they sadistically mock ethicists who eloquently criticize it, and also had it done to them for non-religious reasons against their will.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Or go on about how "beautiful" it is to cut an infant's penis. Is the practice of "metzitztah b'peh"- once widespread in Judaism and still common among some Orthodox, and also legal- also beautiful to you? Is an old man sucking an infant's bloody penis your idea of beauty?pic.twitter.com/zsGu29z8Vp
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.