Pointing out an instance where males are at a disadvantage (e.g. male infant #circumcision) = #misogyny = #MRA = dismissible. Is that the way it works? #i2
-
-
Replying to @Joseph4GI
For nearly a decade, MRA's have made themselves allies. Girls have been protected from mutilation since the 90's. And the west left the male half of the population behind. Intersex babies, a slim minority, will probably see their human rights recognized before males.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DGChristensen @Joseph4GI
The MRA element is altogether a minority of anti-circ activism (and it's far from their biggest concern) yet their association is endlessly treated as representative and used to dismiss and demonize the entire thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Nijrisupmat @Joseph4GI
MRA orgs have made bold anti circumcision statements. People who are feminist who agree do so as individuals. That's what I was originally getting at.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, but I was also talking about general opposition to circumcision. MRA's are a minority of that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.