"Our analysis then reveals that polarized teams—those consisting of a balanced set of politically diverse editors—create articles of higher quality than politically homogeneous teams. The effect appears most strongly in Wikipedia’s Political articles..."https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/943507941629476869 …
-
-
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
How exactly are they evaluating the "quality" of an article? Looking at the paper they are presuming that a featured article is a good article, while a stub is a bad article. Is this necessarily the case? Isn't it possible (or likely even) that a featured article is more wrong?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Nihlogos @jordanbpeterson
Depends on your epistemological framing, doesn't it? Wikipedia is open source. If you have a more reliable method, you're free to host and publish.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atom_smashr @jordanbpeterson
The point I'm trying to make is something like this: Of course articles with political diversity of editors are more likely to be featured. In order for an article to be featured, it has to be approved by a consensus. This process makes the article more tolerable to the average.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This of course, doesn't represent the "quality" of an article, which I would argue is determined by its truth value. It is entirely possible that this consensus process actually LOWERS the truth value of an article. If the truth is offensive to the other side, it is contested.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Nihlogos @jordanbpeterson
By some objective standard of truth you happen to have access to, no doubt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atom_smashr @jordanbpeterson
I'm not making any claims about what is and is not true. I'm presuming that there is a truth, and that in some cases (maybe in many cases) it is contrary to the ideology of the left and the right. I'm assuming truths that contradict the ideology are likely to be suppressed...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Thus making the truth pass through the filtration system of two ideologies rather than one is actually detrimental to an article's quality (its truth value). Basically I disagree with the whole article and think it's dumb. Of course I disagree with everything.. just having fun.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.