"Superhuman Starcraft Play with Deep Reinforcement Learning": https://bit.ly/2de38pb
You don't understand the point I'm making. Voting activists encourage people to vote by praising the idea of voting in general. They only do this because they think that the person will vote the way they want. If they thought that people would vote counter to their beliefs...
-
-
Then they wouldn't advocate for voting at all. So why encourage people to vote in general rather than vote for a specific candidate? It reeks of dishonesty and sleaziness to me, which is why I dislike it.
-
Think about the stats I shared. If it was a 50/50 split then those statistics would suggest adding more voters wouldn't change the democrat's or GOP's advantage. But it isn't 50/50. More people register to vote, larger democrat advantage.
-
Yes... that's precisely the point. So why is the "it's your duty as a citizen to vote" kind of rhetoric used? It's... not about your duty as a citizen, that's a bunch of bull. It's about you voting for whoever the voting advocate wants you to vote for.
-
Okay I think I see your point. No we don't care if conservative voices are listened to quite the opposite. We want them stiffled and silenced


don't get it twisted. Minority rule by conservatives is BS. -
So yeah. Get mad
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.