Acknowledgement of genetic influences on self-esteem on the first page is a good start 2/8pic.twitter.com/tWw3X1hsjk
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Acknowledgement of genetic influences on self-esteem on the first page is a good start 2/8pic.twitter.com/tWw3X1hsjk
Oh good the NLSY data is great. It can also afford control of genetic effects via sibling samples. But because of the #NurtureAssumption it is better to stick with one mother, one child instead...
4/8pic.twitter.com/l9tHat72P2
HOME as a measurement is as close to the definition of the ‘shared environment’ as one can get. Research showed a decade ago that such measures so sig heritability estimates https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/genetic-influences-on-measures-of-the-environment-a-systematic-review/76ECA7D8F0F92906DBB2AAFBED720F0C … 5/8pic.twitter.com/qmReuj5jXp
Self-esteem: As mentioned in the intro, SE shows sig heritibility.. here is a sampling of h2 est that we’re using in a current project 6/8pic.twitter.com/uJXxMRn9p6
Results of home environment on SE. Overall r of ~.15 – with no genetic controls, I say #GeneticConfounding is highly likely here..
7/8pic.twitter.com/ArxcgSEFIm
Future research? What about the current research? NLSY79 can’t control for genetic influence – wrong. We (@FSNole57 @econnolly11 @TKShackelford @BioPetko) did it with NLSY79 just this past year.. odd
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617300077 …
8/8pic.twitter.com/WaTtF8snbg
Nature vs nurture is a false dichotomy
100% agree.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.