Aren't the soc sci and evo psych views essentially the same? Dominance/control = control sexuality. Social roles as products of evolution..?
-
-
-
No, social sci proposes that men are socialized via culture to exert dominance & control
-
Thx! If socsci conceded that social roles have been shaped by evo, bt still argued that socialisation still a big factor, would u disgaree?
-
yes, in the sense that individuals (and their evolved psychology) create the culture and society they live in.
-
Also, the authors of this paper also published another review on bio perspectives on IPV.pic.twitter.com/SWwdtLy8Ub
-
But, for the authors, biological = pathology. The word "Evolution" is not mentioned in either paper. See also, conclusions for each paper..pic.twitter.com/kKU3ZEVPSo
-
Thanks for that. Right. I guess they're definitely missing a piece of the puzzle then!
-
Agreed!
@TKShackelford &@aarongoetz published an EP/comparitive psych review of IPV in the same journal back in 2008, if interested!pic.twitter.com/eitcd8bJT3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
dovetails with emotional/verbal violence to degrade self-esteem/underestimate mate value?
-
Yes--similar logic for how we propose "Cost-Inflicting" Mate Retention behaviors function in romantic relationships
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.