Bitcoin was never acting like a monetary safe haven. It has always been acting like an emergent monetary good - volatility / price discovery as a network increases by orders of magnitude. It's as if gold-bugs think gold was magically not volatile when it emerged as monetary good.https://twitter.com/PeterSchiff/status/999317444580859904 …
-
-
I think evidence of some cultures ignoring gold doesn't detract from the mystery of why it appears MOST cultures through varying epochs/geographies overwhelmingly VALUED it, based on its natural characteristics. The key here is overwhelming majority.
-
No, that's about 99.9% of cultures with gold in their environment, but no exposure to cultures turning gold into artifacts, ignored gold. The first and early uses of gold were extremely non-obvious, entailing extremely high uncertainty.
-
Final Twt (as usual enjoyed this). You don't have any evidence for the claim above Nick which is a relatively new, falsifiable anthropological theory. And even if I believe it, doesn't change last 4,500 years where a MAJORITY overwhelmingly embraced the natural properties of AU.
-
The stability of the subsequent millennia are irrelevant to the uncertainties entailed in the first few decades.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
h/t "Gold rush what took ye so long":https://elaineou.com/2017/05/05/gold-rush-what-took-ye-so-long/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.