If they (and you) read up on what travelers, missionaries, & ethnographers actually witnessed & recorded of recently contacted cultures, you will find that SoV & medium of wealth transfer long preceded record-keeping. See https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/954225789129469952 … & refs in the linked articles.https://twitter.com/mikejcasey/status/981141578285805569 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
No. Human memories aren't reliable or trustworthy enough to serve, unaided by later technologies and institutions, as cross-clan records. Clans typically not only distrusted each other, they bloodily fought each other.
0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Nothing about evo psych in particular suggests in-group Social dynamics generalize well to inter-group or vice versa.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Yes. The natural unaided ability to form reliable trust relationships is limited to about 150 people (the Dunbar number). Archaeological record of preliterate societies records travel of collectibles, of kind later observed as SoV/MoWT, across territories of 10,000s of people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
These collectibles were, therefore, trust-minimized. Their transfer across so many groups of people that couldn't be reliably trusted couldn't have been based on unsecured credit. & the most common (shells & monetary metals) have the design characteristics of trust minimization.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.