Users asked for their information to be shared - as per Zuck's last response here. It will happen again.
-
-
-
The vast majority certainly did not ask for any such thing. They just approved something that sounded innocuous and couldn't find the hidden forms and essentially secret tricks to turn sharing off.
-
Do you have an actual citation for this?
-
Tick the box next to "i agree to the terms and conditions" and I'll tell you everything.
-
I prefer to interpret Nick’s silence as “no”. Here’s some empirical evidence from 2011pic.twitter.com/wiHdFMk71w
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Come on, no-one trusts Snowden anymore. Agree he's (implicitly) lying though.
-
Ugh it’s getting harder to be critical of Facebook now that everyone is spreading lies about them selling private information. Facebook sells one thing to advertisers - the attention of its users.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The cat is out of the bag now! Facebook, Twitter, etc have MAJOR problems now. We need decentralized versions that pay us for our data, that allow us complete control of our data oR NO DEAL!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"No camera tricks" -- David Coperfield (the magician)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The irony of this statement is brilliant. It would be interesting if someone could create an online trusted ledger where the transactions would be transparent and viewed by several different entities to keep them accountable and trusted. You wouldn't need a 3rd party. ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Greed does not care about morality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why I’m so excited about trust free products. Bc so many companies LIE about what they make, how they make it and how safe their products are. I’ve seen it up close.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PPL mad at FB. Sh*t all these sites collect/sell (share) ur info. AND, this is allowed by so many in the chain & is accept'd practice. Po-LIE-ticians and others pay no attention to the ramifications of technology but allow GREED to rule. Look around. Now we have no privacy!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blockchain technology can't be developed fast enough. Changing trusted third parties is only an intermediary step. Eliminating them with decentralized trust will be the final step in recapturing control of our indentities
-
A regulator's goals are ambiguous and distant, and accountability is none. No incentive to act in the interests of those being regulated. Infact, perverse incentives to collude with those excessively grazing the common good, becoming an active party to 'Tragedy of the Commons'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you Nick! Here I ask who regulates the regulator, and answer the question too!https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/facebook-perils-platform-monopolies-arifa-khan/?published=t …
-
A regulator's goals are ambiguous and distant, and accountability none. No incentive to act in the interests of those being regulated. Infact, perverse incentives to collude with those excessively grazing the common good, becoming an active party to 'Tragedy of the Commons'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sometimes? You can never trust a third party. "gvt" is the biggest third party and least trustable that has ever been created by far!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes: “trusted third parties” = “wolf in sheep's clothing”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ICO is better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.