So, a blockchain approach wouldn't work in politics. Thanks for clarifying.
Making good law requires much time and pain: https://unenumerated.blogspot.co.il/2008/02/discovery-of-law.html … Applies to good governance too. There's been no blockchain breakthrough in better governance. What public blockchains enable is the operation of some important institutions like money with far *less* governance.
-
-
-
No, but in some cases it can substitute for things that often have been (or at least many people think should be) controlled by politics, for example money.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
That stuff is a higher layer "protocol", not necessary for the good functioning of the money itself, just often for the best use of that money.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Is it fair to say the fragmentation of BTC into BCH etc is evidence of a lack of better governance?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Third category in addition to common law and statutory law: regulatory-agency-created "quasi-law" implied by patterns of discretionary enforcement. This can be the most dangerous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Depends on your definition of ‘law’. Code can act as one of many forms of ‘law’ and doesn’t necessarily require a group of people to decide on ethics & philosophy.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Possibly the same amount of governance but more efficient as it transitions from wet to dry?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Law is science. Legislators only need to discover it. It seems so obvious now. Once again, thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The ability to set precedent in future cases will be how the blockchain will help develop the legal aid.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your Gov is 2 narrow. Money / Trade / Base is Protocol (functionality). Distribution Governance is different. 12.5 BTC vs 1 BTC per Block, changes nothing in Function. It’s Distribution. Method of decision = Social Governance. /1 of 2
-
None can justify 12.5 BTC per Block AND it violates White Paper ‘one Node one Vote’. False Promise? This is failure of Distribution. Solution is Complex. But one can limit significance of mistake by 1 BTC per Block until Solution Known. Or are Errors best Forgotten. /2 of 2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Blockchain solved governance at the infrastructure level, but not at the superstructure level (development, social attacks)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does that include
@tez0s as well ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.