Security has a concept called attack surface: the more kinds of exposures, the greater the attack surface. Similarly we can think of governance as having an argument surface: the more kinds of decisions there are to argue over, the less functional the institution will be.
-
Decisions are mainly power exercises. Even when knowledge sharing is involved, the last word is up to the structures which enforce the decision. Such structures will always need a non-automatable decision making to survive
-
-
I agree, and I think that it will be the only workable path to go
-
Technocrats hard at work. First step to solving a problem is knowing you have one. You can't code for problems you don't know exist. Limiting governance isn't a solution.
-
As I understood
@NickSzabo4 it is about automating the most as possible areas for decision making: minimize the area of debateble decisions, is more related, to me with optimize, not to limiting. However, this area to be minimized will never be zero.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like America has a Caesar at the moment in Trump, maybe America will soon be in a state of Martial Law... The Roman Empire will be revived briefly. Trust in the plan. 2019.
#caesarThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.