Only now getting up to speed on the suggestion of creating a formal ERP (Ethereum Recovery Proposal) procedure for recovering ETH lost to mistakes, bugs etc. IMO going down this path would be very dangerous. Yoichi resigned as an EIP editor because of the legal uncertainty.https://twitter.com/pirapira/status/963950687288733697 …
-
-
Replying to @ChrisLundkvist @iang_fc
I think this fear is misplaced. You should not be afraid to participate in public decentralized self-governance for fear that some legal jurisdiction will claim authority over the whole thing. Just my opinion
5 replies 6 retweets 27 likes -
When software engineers are called upon to make legal and accounting decisions, their fears of legal action are quite well placed.
1 reply 15 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @socrates1024 and
Nick, what would have been the best practical solution to the recent EIP issue?
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @tigranca @socrates1024 and
Community norms should forbid expanding the scope of software upgrades to include making particular legal and accounting decisions to modify balances. It's an abuse of the software upgrade process, an invitation for lawyers to take over, and destructive of social scalability.
4 replies 52 retweets 181 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @tigranca and
What's different about creating new software with legal/accounting policies contained within them in the first place (like issuance schedules, etc) vs making changes?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @socrates1024 @tigranca and
Political analogies in this field seriously suck, but one comes to mind anyway: the difference between special legislation (fixing a particular case which should properly dealt with by courts) vs. general legislation.
1 reply 3 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @socrates1024 and
ERP is an amateur court that lacks the most basic procedural protections one learns in the first year of law school: notice to affected parties, criteria for quality of evidence, etc.
1 reply 11 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @socrates1024 and
ERP has no reliable or secure way to verify the supposedly required "real" names, nor to map them to social media nyms, nor to securely map these to the impacted Ethereum addresses. For this and many other reasons it would be a ripe target for fraudulent claims.
1 reply 7 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @tigranca and
These are good points. I hope we strive to build worthy self-governance, learning from courts. To summarize, a) stick to general policies rather than specific meddling, b) "status quo" is a prudent default, c) beyond that requires better process?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
Stick to general dry code: that is what software engineers know how to do. Don't mess with particular balances: that is a job lawyers and accountants know how to do, to the extent anyone does.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.