Almost any conjectures about the future behavior of humans in a novel social system are necessarily non-rigorous. Pretending they are rigorous is a fallacy akin to false precision. Overly exact models give many people false certainty about social (including economic) behavior. https://twitter.com/cryptokaze666/status/956469671871635456 …
Yes but they are qualitatively less complicated than social systems, which involve strategic decisions of brains as large as our own.
-
-
How do you know that if you admittedly cant model "quality"?
-
We can know objectively how the technology itself will behave, mainly via computer science.
-
If you presuppose that a person is conjecturing then obviously their statements will be non-rigorous. Those who don't know a thing can't comment on it. This is not conjecture
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.