Conjectured governance under proof-of-stake seems to involve programmers & other amateurs making legal & accounting decisions. Bitcoin governance does not. Even when lawyers & accountants properly take over PoS governance, PoW governance will likely be far more socially scalable.
Almost any conjectures about the future behavior of humans in a novel social system are necessarily non-rigorous. Pretending they are rigorous is a fallacy akin to false precision. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_precision …
-
-
kind of like Utopianism....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.