Conjectured governance under proof-of-stake seems to involve programmers & other amateurs making legal & accounting decisions. Bitcoin governance does not. Even when lawyers & accountants properly take over PoS governance, PoW governance will likely be far more socially scalable.
-
I don't think most programmers would appreciate you calling them "amateurs". Remember that without them, your legal & accounting people can sit around twiddling their thumbs.
Limitations of 240 characters. Those inexperienced at law or accounting are amateurs it comes to making legal and accounting decisions, just as accountants & lawyers are generally amateurs when it comes to making technology decisions.
-
-
“Limitations of 240 characters” we took to that change quick <actual lol>
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
True. But all are ultimately necessary.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.