The question is far less about who makes the operational decisions and far more about what kinds of operational decisions people are called on to make.
-
-
-
PoW is socially scalable because it’s currently limited in scope. If there were multiple types of PoW for BTC then governance complexity rises (ie the more types of work rewarded with coin the greater need for rules).
-
Historically rewarding specialized labor (PoW) scaled society from encampments to cities to global culture.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think most programmers would appreciate you calling them "amateurs". Remember that without them, your legal & accounting people can sit around twiddling their thumbs.
-
Limitations of 240 characters. Those inexperienced at law or accounting are amateurs it comes to making legal and accounting decisions, just as accountants & lawyers are generally amateurs when it comes to making technology decisions.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
-
-
-
I think this is illusory. Most scenarios where conjectured PoS governance requires active intervention are scenarios in which PoW just plain falls apart.
-
You know what’s illusory? The idea that ETH is decentralised.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You do realize we have a Sun right?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Physical. We have a Sun with a clean energy output that is mind blowing. We just need to do a better job at tapping this energy.
-
Renewables + crypto mining seems to synergistically reduce the need for battery storage while decentralizing future energy production. The mind boggles....
-
Agreed!
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.