I'm sorry to quibble, but isn't it "third parties," not "trusted third parties?" There's a difference between the two, and both carry risk.
Trusted third parties are reliability risks.https://twitter.com/githubstatus/status/892060343920414720 …
-
-
-
Bitcoin full nodes are examples of third parties that collectively do something important but individual need trust any one only a smidgen.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So is running it yourself (more so).
-
Depends on your setup, but the way people do things now that's almost always true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good time to release an ICO for blockchain-based code depository :-) ICO everything!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not just call them security holes ?
Decentralized OSS HUB <-- No ICO's to blockchain dat yet ? 
(but seriously tho)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give people a decentralized source control system and what do they do with it? :D
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.